There was a lot of great feedback on my post on what makes a senior software developer. I have compiled the best comments here.

The post on developers making negative contributions was controversial. Some of the opposing points need to be addressed.

Not all developers make positive contributions. Some create more work for others than they do themselves.

The notion of a "senior" developer is extremely subjective. How can we define it better?

Some hiring managers will rule out a candidate for graduating from a bootcamp. Does it really matter if a candidate went through a bootcamp or a 4 year degree?